A Retrospective Analysis of Safety in Participants Treated with a Hybrid Hyaluronic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyapatite Filler.

Background: Limited long-term safety data are published on HA/CaHA/L, a hybrid dermal filler combining hyaluronic acid (HA), calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), and lidocaine (L). Methods: This retrospective multicenter study assessed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in adults treated with HA/CaHA/L. The full analysis set (FAS) included eligible consented adults (N = 403); the long-term safety analysis (LTSA) set included FAS participants with greater than or equal to 12-months HA/CaHA/L exposure (n = 243). Results: Participants were majority female (94.0%), with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes II/III (80.1%) and a mean age of 50.1 years. Most participants (86.4%) received one HA/CaHA/L treatment. The median time between participants' first HA/CaHA/L treatment and chart review was 15.4 months. Participants received a mean of 2.2 mL (0.5-8.9 mL) filler per treatment. Treated areas were predominantly malar (71.2%) and mandible (69.7%) regions. Most participants (95.0%) had one or more aesthetic treatments other than HA/CaHA/L [eg, other dermal fillers (84.1%), botulinum toxin (63.3%)]. Nineteen (4.7%) FAS participants had 20 documented TEAEs; most (3.5%, n = 14 participants) were mild in severity. Twelve TEAEs in 11 participants (2.7%) were related to HA/CaHA/L: induration (three, 0.7%), edema (3, 0.7%), and implant site nodules (five, 1.2%), which were noninflammatory and likely related to product placement. Among the LTSA, 15 (6.2%) participants had 16 documented TEAEs (six edema, five implant site nodules, one inflammation, three skin induration, one hypersensitivity); most were mild in severity. Nine TEAEs in eight participants (3.3%) were HA/CaHA/L-related. No treatment-emergent serious AEs were reported. Conclusion: The data from this noninterventional retrospective study support the favorable longer term (>12 month) safety profile of HA/CaHA/L.

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale to Assess Marionette Lines.

BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of marionette lines before and after treatment in clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of a 5-point photonumeric marionette lines scale. METHODS: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, and real and morphed subject images for each scale grade. Intrarater and interrater reliability was evaluated in initial scale validation (web-based review) ( N = 51 ) and live-subject validation ( N = 75 ) studies, each completed during 2 sessions. RESULTS: In the initial scale validation study, intrarater agreement for 2 physician raters was near perfect (weighted kappa = 0.92 and 0.94). Interrater agreement was excellent during sessions 1 and 2 (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94 and 0.95, respectively). In the live-subject validation study, intrarater agreement for 3 physician raters showed a strong correlation (mean weighted kappa = 0.77). Interrater agreement was high during live-subject validation sessions 1 and 2 (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.89 for both sessions). CONCLUSION: This new marionette lines scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of marionette line severity.

A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Real-World Study of VYC-17.5L Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler in the Lips.

Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) injectable gels are used to define, enhance, and volumize facial regions, such as the lips, a common treatment area. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the HA injectable gel Juvéderm Volift (Allergan, Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company Irvine, CA) with Lidocaine (VYC-17.5L) for lip augmentation in real-world clinical practice. Methods: This prospective, open-label, multicenter study initially designed for 6 months, then extended to 12 months, enrolled adults with an overall grade of minimal to moderate on the Lip Fullness Scale 2 (LFS2). Optional touch-up and repeat treatments occurred at day 14 and month 12, respectively. The primary endpoint was a ≥1-point improvement on the LFS2 at day 30. Other endpoints included improvements on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Lips questionnaire, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), subject assessment of natural look/feel of lips, and investigator assessment of dynamic lip lines upon animation. Injection site reactions (ISRs) and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: Of 60 subjects enrolled (mean age, 36.8 years; 98.3% female), 59 were evaluable for efficacy at day 30; 13 (21.4%) received touch-up treatment. Thirty-six of 40 subjects completed the extension study (month 12). LFS2 responder rates were 93.2% at day 30 (primary endpoint) and 39.0% at month 12. Mean scores on the FACE-Q questionnaire improved from baseline by 45.2 points and 23.6 points at day 30 and month 12, respectively. Most subjects showed improvements on the GAIS. The majority of ISRs were mild/moderate; no serious AEs occurred. Conclusions: VYC-17.5L was effective and well tolerated for lip augmentation through 12 months posttreatment.

Improvement of Radial Cheek Lines With Hyaluronic Acid-Based Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L: Results of the BEAM Study.

BACKGROUND: Radial cheek lines (RCL) may convey an older, potentially less attractive appearance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid-based dermal filler VYC-17.5L for correcting RCL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three women (40-65 years) received injections of VYC-17.5L in both cheeks on Day 1 (optional Day 14 touch-up). Effectiveness was evaluated on Day 45 by subject-rated dynamic RCL improvement (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale [GAIS]; primary end point) and independent, noninjecting investigator-rated GAIS; subject Self-Perception of Age (SPA); subject-assessed satisfaction with and natural look of treatment; and instrument-assessed changes in static and dynamic RCL roughness, amplitude, and texture (secondary end points). Safety assessments included injection site responses (ISRs). RESULTS: On Day 45, 98% of subjects rated RCL as improved or much improved (investigator rated: 95%). Subjects with same or older SPA before treatment (n = 38) perceived themselves as 2.0 and 5.5 average years younger after treatment, respectively. Day 45 mean satisfaction with and natural look of treated areas was 7.9/10 and 7.2/10, respectively. Treatment significantly improved RCL roughness, amplitude, and texture (all p < .001). Most common ISRs were hematoma (35.9%), bruising (30.2%), and irregularities/bumps (22.6%); most ISRs were mild. CONCLUSION: VYC-17.5L effectively corrected dynamic RCL, improved instrument-assessed indicators of skin quality, and resulted in younger age perception.

A Prospective, Open-Label Study of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Filler With Lidocaine (VYC-15L) Treatment for the Correction of Infraorbital Skin Depressions.

BACKGROUND: Infraorbital skin depressions are one of the most troublesome facial areas for aesthetically aware patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate effectiveness and safety of Juvéderm Volbella with Lidocaine (VYC-15L; Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland) for correction of bilateral infraorbital depressions. METHODS: In this 12-month, prospective, uncontrolled, open-label study, subjects aged ≥18 years with infraorbital depressions rated ≥1 on the Allergan Infra-oRbital Scale (AIRS) received injections of VYC-15L with optional touch-up treatment on Day 14. The primary efficacy measure was ≥1 AIRS grade improvement from baseline at month 1. RESULTS: Of 80 subjects initially treated with VYC-15L, 75 (94%) completed the study. All injections were intentionally deep, most using multiple microbolus technique. At 1 month, 99.3% of eyes achieved ≥1 AIRS grade improvement. The responder rate (subjects with ≥1 AIRS grade improvement in both eyes) was 99% at month 1, 92% at month 6, and 54% at month 12. Most injection site reactions (e.g., bruising, redness, irregularities/bumps) were mild and resolved by day 14. Late-onset mild to moderate edema was observed in 11% of eyes at month 6% and 4% of eyes at month 12. CONCLUSION: VYC-15L is effective and safe for the treatment of infraorbital depressions, with effectiveness lasting up to 12 months.

Creation and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale to Assess Volume Deficiency in the Infraorbital Region.

BACKGROUND: The eyes are particularly important aesthetic features of the face and revitalization of the infraorbital region has become a focus of aesthetic treatments. Published infraorbital scales to date have limitations in that they have been descriptive, subjective, or have used computer-generated images. Thus, there is an unmet need for a validated scale based on actual images. OBJECTIVE: To develop a practical photonumeric scale that respects the complex anatomy and age-related changes occurring in the orbital area. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Allergan Infra-oRbital Scale (AIRS) was developed through a multistep process in collaboration with 16 physicians (plastic surgeons, dermatologists, and aesthetic physicians). Scale development involved both online photographs and live assessments of subjects. Interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The final AIRS showed intrarater and interrater ICCs of 0.78 to 0.86 and 0.91 to 0.98 for live validation and 0.76 to 0.82 and 0.86 to 0.91 for online validation, respectively, demonstrating robust validity. CONCLUSION: The AIRS can be considered a photonumeric scale that accurately describes volume loss in the infraorbital region. It has been validated and is appropriate for use in research or for everyday clinical use for both live and photographic assessment.

A Prospective, Open-Label, Observational, Postmarket Study Evaluating VYC-17.5L for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Over 12 Months.

BACKGROUND: VYC-17.5L (17.5 mg/mL hyaluronic acid, 0.3% lidocaine) is a dermal filler intended for deep dermis injection for the treatment of skin depressions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 12-month effectiveness and safety of VYC-17.5L for the treatment of moderate/severe nasolabial folds (NLFs). METHODS: Subjects ≥18 years old with moderate/severe NLFs were recruited (N = 70). Injected volume was aimed at achieving optimum correction; top-up treatment was given at 2 weeks if needed. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed change in NLF severity over 12 months using the validated photonumeric NLF Severity Scale. Secondary endpoints included investigator- and subject-assessed satisfaction and safety. Adverse events judged to be more severe or prolonged than routinely observed were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-five subjects completed study requirements. Mean volume injected was 3.0 ± 1.0 mL for both NLFs combined. Significant improvement was maintained in investigator-assessed NLF severity at 12 months, and investigators and subjects reported high satisfaction with VYC-17.5L throughout the study. Two unexpected adverse events were reported: (1) redness, swelling, and decreased sensitivity (resolved after 4 days) and (2) swelling (resolved after 48 hours); neither event was serious or life threatening. CONCLUSION: VYC-17.5L is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of moderate to severe NLFs for 1 year.